Adventures in woo

We've just taken delivery of our new issue, which should be on its way to subscribers as I write. As a little sample, we've published our commissioning editor Laurie Taylor's Endgame column, in which he recounts a traumatic trip to a health farm he took earlier this year. It was a holistic world of chakras, auras and life force energy, and like a true rationalist Laurie lasted just a couple of hours.

And in a woo double-bill, this seems like an appropriate place to reproduce this news story from the new issue:

One chakra short of a guru?

What with one thing and another it’s not always easy to find a good guru when you need one, so New Humanist was delighted to come across a copy of EnlightenNext, which describes itself as “The magazine for evolutionaries” and is available for a modest £4.95.

This is not, however, a magazine concerned with such small-scale evolutionary matters as the latest fossil finds. It is aimed at those who want to live at the “very leading edge of evolution” itself. People, that is, who are sufficiently advanced to be able to bring “a new spiritual and moral paradigm into the heart of 21st-century culture”.

And – well, you’ve guessed it – to become one of those leading edge people you’ll need paid help from experts. You might, for example, favour Ken Wilber, who offers “integral coaching” and asks, “Are you serious about unfolding in a whole new way?” Because if you are, then Ken asks, “Where do you want to grow?” and promises that he’ll help “build the muscles to get you there”.

If that sort of growing doesn’t sound fast enough to fit into your busy life then you might prefer the “accelerated growth” offered by Saniel Bonder and Linda Groves-Bonder. The Bonders tell us that “The HEART” is our “human-divine essence” and that they “transmit whole-being nutrition through many means to help you find HEART-strength in these turbulent times”.

But even the Bonders seem small beer compared to Doctor Don Beck, a “rare Integral Design Engineer” who leads the way “in defusing and refocusing the dangerously high energy in global hot spots”. Yes, wherever there’s dangerously high energy around, Doctor Beck is on call: “In Israel/Palestine, Russia, Mexico, Chile, Latin America, South Africa and South Chicago” he is “on the ground and in the thick of it”.

One last word of advice though. Before you decide to move to the leading edge of evolution it might be a good idea to check your mucoid layers. These, according to the Arise and Shine advertisement, are the “long dark rubbery ropes” which people expel towards the end of 40 days of fasting. There’s a helpful picture of some black ropey looking objects and even though we’re no expert on these matters, from the look of them they’re definitely better out than in. Not that we want to be too dogmatic. As Avona Carttier, who runs the mucoid cleansing business, reasonably says: “If these mucoid layers are left inside your body, that’s your business. If you want to get rid of them that’s our business.”

Massive kites pulling catamarans across the sea could make clean energy for the entire world

Take a huge oceanic catamaran, stick a hydroelectric turbine underneath it, and hitch it to a 6.5 million-square-foot parafoil flying nearly a mile in the air. That’s a Korean research team’s new proposal for generating gigawatts of clean energy.

As the parafoil pulls the boat, seawater would be forced through the turbine, which generates electricity. The 800 megawatts of electricity produced would separate seawater into hydrogen and oxygen by electrolysis, and the hydrogen would then be stored on-board the ships.

“The calculation shows that, with a large such ship, a gigawatt order electrical power may be harvested by this system,” wrote Park Chul of the Korea Aerospace Research Institute and Kim Jongchul of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, in the journal Energy in March.

“If such ships are deployed at 20-km (12.4-mile) intervals over two temperate zones, one in the middle of the Pacific Ocean in the Northern Hemisphere and the other everywhere in the Southern Hemisphere, the total power produced will be many times that needed by the world,” they wrote.

Continues: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/03/hydro-paraplant/

7 arrests in alleged Irish plot to kill Muhammad cartoonist

Irish police today arrested seven suspects over an alleged plot to kill a Swedish artist who drew the Prophet Muhammad with the body of a dog.

The target of the alleged assassination was Lars Vilks, who had a $100,000 (£67,000) bounty put on his head by al-Qaida in 2007, with a 50% bonus if Vilks was “slaughtered like a lamb” by having his throat cut. Another $50,000 was said to have been put on the life of Ulf Johansson, editor-in-chief of Nerikes Allehanda, the local newspaper that printed the cartoon.

The four men and three women, who were detained at about 10am this morning, are in their mid-20s to late-40s and are being held at stations in Waterford, Tramore, Dungarvan and Thomastown. Garda sources have confirmed that some of those arrested hold Irish citizenship and a number are from the Middle East. Some of those questioned have been confirmed as converts to Islam.

The suspects are being held under Ireland’s Criminal Justice Act 2007. Under Irish law they can be held in custody for up to seven days.

Continues: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/09/seven-arrested-ireland-muhammad-cartoon

Honesty Project, Day 1: Starting off by jumping in the deep end.

So everyone’s favorite Godless Girl had an idea: the Honesty Project, a challenge to blog/tweet whatever something honest about yourself every day for a week. And as I continue to suffer a bit of writer’s block (brought on by too much I want to write about, so it’s all good, it’ll come with time), what the hell. In I go, and if I’m going to do this thing, I’m going to freakin” do it. So, looking over a list of prompts that she provided today for ideas, I’m starting off by jumping in the deep end.

The deep end would be, in this case, my worst sexual experience. Which is something — it, and me and sex and general — I have a hard time talking about. Partly because of reasons that will be clear after you read this, and partly because of other things about myself that I could be honest about.

My worst experience isn’t a specific instance of sex, but rather sex with a specific person. All of my relationship hang-ups have some tie to this time, and this person, and most importantly to the Gregory That Was Then. I was insecure,  lonely, and screwed up. I hated myself, and thought that there was nothing, not one tiny little thing, that was lovable or good about me.

And there was Z, the perfect mirror for my madness and self-loathing. I didn’t love her. Didn’t even like her, really. I put up with her because I was lonely, because I was scared and lost and my heart was ice. I put up with her because she liked me, and made the first move and made me feel, for just a moment, like maybe I wasn’t completely hideous and unlovable.

It seems, looking back, like she was a lot like me — deeply insecure, messed up emotionally. What a screwed up dynamic. The worst thing, though, was the banality, the boredom of the thing, lifeless passionless cold.

And here’s the sad thing: she was my first. Not my first sexual experience, but my first all the way, and it was so horrible. Horribly disappointing, horribly passionless, horribly lifeless. I was desperately trying to feel something by — damn but I feel like an evil dick for saying this — by fucking a corpse. My first time, and I was being intimate with someone I loathed, and all because I was so desperate to feel anything as long as it wasn’t the clasping hands of the Void. I had this feeling that sex was life and warmth, heat and passion and connection, and here it was just cold and damp and dead, and I felt more alone than ever.

As the months went by, I felt worse and worse, sick to my stomach worse. Colder and lonelier and filled with a constant dread that weighed on my every thought. There came this night, one that would probably be the Worst Sexual Experience for me in terms of an event, when I lay next to her afterwords, listening to her snore softly in her sleep. I’m naked on the bed and there’s another human being next to me and I’m feeling like the Loneliest Person in the universe, so far from any other human that I might as well be in a universe by myself. I’m hating myself, hating my body, hating the feelings, hating the thought of her touching me. Even the hate is a passionless thing. There’s no heat in it. I want to cry, to let the tears cleanse me, and I’m so far past that and into the Void that I can’t even remember how.

I really, really know what it is like to feel dirty and horrible. to feel cheap and vile and used.

And I lay there knowing that really, I was doing it to myself.

I remember thinking that it was like I was raping myself. I learned, that night, that I couldn’t trust myself, and I broke it off soon after, and ran away from relationships for so long, and so thoroughly, that it’s taken me years to find my way partly back to the point where I can contemplate it. Intimacy, even as I recover from so many years of depression, is a hard, hard thing for me. Even as now I find myself craving it — in far healthier ways, and for far healthier reasons. Because the scars from my time with Z, well, those suckers are pretty damn deep.


Tagged: relationships, sex, The Honesty Project

Humanists urge MPs to call for law reform on assisted dying

The British Humanist Association (BHA) has urged MPs to speak in favour of a reform to the law on assisted dying, when they debate the issue in the House of Commons later today.

Coming so soon after the publication of the new prosecution guidelines on assisted dying in the UK, as well as recent calls for an independent inquiry into the law in the House of Lords, it is particularly timely that elected representatives have a chance now to make the case for a reform in the law in the UK.

Andrew Copson, BHA Chief Executive, said, ‘The final prosecution guidelines have distinguished between where a person has compassionately assisted another to die, and where that was done with malicious intent. That is a clarification that was badly needed and is to be welcomed. However, the guidelines will always be retrospective, after an assisted death has taken place, and the law itself remains unchanged.’

‘Legalising assisted dying is the only sure way to give terminally ill or incurably suffering people full autonomy and choice at end of life, and at the same time to ensure strict legal safeguards are in place to protect those that are vulnerable from coercion or other malice. This is a proposal that has overwhelming public support and its implementation would be a compassionate recognition of human autonomy and dignity'

Some Semblance of Sanity in Lone Star State

In recent years I’ve watched with horrified interest – and fear – as right-wing theocrats entrenched in the the Texas Board of Education have fought to insert fundogelical content into the state’s (and, ultimately, the nation’s) public school curriculum. I breathed a quick sigh of relief this evening upon learning that, in a recent election, Don McLeroy, a fundogelical dentist from Bryan, Texas, lost the board seat he had held since 1999.

My sigh was just a little one, though, since the vote was awfully close: 50.4%-49.6%. Also, McLeroy will retain his position until the end of the year (academic rather than calendar year, I pray hope), so he’s still got time to do some damage. Still, I will allow myself to enjoy (for tonight only!) some hope that the futures of both Texas and the USA may not be entirely bleak, and that reason may yet prevail in the world sometime in the current millennium.

– the chaplain


Filed under: history, politics, rationalism, religion, science

“You’re not giving ME the pills because of YOUR religion?”

A pharmacist refused to issue contraceptive pills prescribed by a doctor because it was against her religion.

Janine Deeley, 38, thought the woman was joking when she took her on one side and said : “I don’t give out contraceptive pills because of my religion.”

The mother of two teenage daughters, from Wybourn , Sheffield, said : “I couldn’t believe the arrogance of the woman . Who is she to refuse to give me properly prescribed legal drugs?

“The irony is that one reason why I am prescribed the pill is because I suffer from endometriosis which causes painful periods.

“But that’s not the point I don’t see why I need to be treated like a child and explain myself to her. I am a responsible adult.

“She had no right to refuse to dispense my prescription except if the drugs weren’t in stock or if she thought the dosage was incorrect.

“The pharmacy is adjoining the doctor’s surgery and I have been using it for years without a problem. But this time I went in gave the assistant the prescription but then the pharmacist came out, took me to one side and said she had the painkillers I had been prescribed but not the contraceptive pill.

“I asked ‘oh why not?’ and she said ‘I don’t give them out because of my religion.’ I honestly thought she was joking and I said ‘Pardon?’.

“She repeated it and I said ‘ You’re not giving ME the pills because of YOUR religion? and she replied ‘yes’.

“I was absolutely stunned. She said I could go to another chemist or return the next day when someone else was on duty. I was fuming and just stormed out.”

She added : “I had no idea what religion the woman was and I don’t remember if she has served me before. The other staff looked very embarrassed but obviously it was the pharmacist’s decision.

“There’s a lot of things in society you might not like or agree with, but you can’t do anything about them.This type of thing shouldn’t be happening, it’s not right.”

Continues: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7404786/Pharmacist-refuses-to-issue-pill-because-of-her-religion.html

Kindness and generosity are contagious

In findings sure to gladden the heart of anyone who’s ever wondered whether tiny acts of kindness have larger consequences, researchers have shown that generosity is contagious.

Goodness spurs goodness, they found: A single act can influence dozens more.

In a game where selfishness made more sense than cooperation, acts of giving were “tripled over the course of the experiment by other subjects who are directly or indirectly influenced to contribute more,” wrote political scientist James Fowler of the University of California, San Diego, and medical sociologist Nicholas Christakis of Harvard University.

Their findings, published March 8 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are the latest in a series of studies the pair have conducted on the spread of behaviors through social networks.

In other papers, they’ve described the spread of obesity, loneliness, happiness and smoking. But there was no way to know whether those apparent behavioral contagions were actually just correlations. People who are overweight, for example, might simply tend to befriend other overweight people, or live in an area where high-fat, low-nutrient diets are the norm.

The latest research was designed to identify cause-and-effect links.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/03/kindness-spreads/

“A nasty attempt to coerce Danish newspapers into apologizing for the cartoons of Muhammad”

Christopher Hitchens, for Slate magazine, attacks the lawyers threatening Danish publishers over the Jyllands-Posten cartoons.

I have just finished reading one of the most astoundingly stupid and nasty documents ever to have landed on my desk. It consists of a letter from a law firm in Saudi Arabia, run by a man named Ahmed Zaki Yamani, to a group of newspapers in Scandinavia. I quote directly from its main paragraphs:

Over the past months my law firm has been contacted by several thousand descendants of the Prophet, who have learned about your newspaper’s republication of the drawing, depicting their esteemed ancestor as a terrorist suicide bomber with a bomb in his turban.

As descendants of the Prophet, these individuals feel personally insulted, emotionally distressed and defamed by your newspaper’s re-publication of the drawing. They have therefore retained my law firm and instructed me to approach you …

So that’s the stupid part—the idea that people who claim descent from a seventh-century warlord and preacher have standing to sue for hurt feelings. The nasty bit comes a few paragraphs later:

[I]t is my belief that your newspaper’s fulfillment of the above-mentioned conditions would be perceived as a sign of respect and understanding throughout the Muslim world in general, and your newspaper might thus help resolve the severe conflict, which your re-publication of the drawing has created. As you may be aware, this conflict is still affecting Danish and Arab interests, in particular in the Middle East, where a number of Danish products are still being boycotted.

It is impossible not to notice the element of threat and menace contained in the second extract. It’s not difficult to remind Danes of the organized campaign of hysterical retribution, ranging from the burnings of embassies to the mob-killing of civilians, that followed the first publication of some mild caricatures of the prophet Muhammad in 2005. Only a little further backstory is required: In 2008, it was discovered that a cell of eager murderers was planning to kill those who authored the caricatures, and in solidarity a large number of Danish newspapers reprinted the drawings in order to express their support for freedom of speech. Then, on New Year’s 2009, a Somali fundamentalistchopped his way into the house of 74-year-old cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, who was having a sleepover with his granddaughter, and very nearly succeeded in axing them both to death. The apology for all this, however, is supposed to be forthcoming not from the aggressors and inciters but from their victims. Late last month, Copenhagen newspaper Politiken agreed to make a public apology on the terms dictated by the Yamani law firm.

Continues: http://www.slate.com/id/2247256/

95%: the odds that we are causing climate change

The evidence that human activity is causing global warming is much stronger than previously stated and is found in all parts of the world, according to a study that attempts to refute claims from sceptics.

The “fingerprints” of human influence on the climate can be detected not only in rising temperatures but also in the saltiness of the oceans, rising humidity, changes in rainfall and the shrinking of Arctic Sea ice at the rate of 600,000 sq km a decade.

The study, by senior scientists from the Met Office Hadley Centre, Edinburgh University, Melbourne University and Victoria University in Canada, concluded that there was an “increasingly remote possibility” that the sceptics were right that human activities were having no discernible impact. There was a less than 5 per cent likelihood that natural variations in climate were responsible for the changes.

The study said that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had understated mankind’s overall contribution to climate change. The IPCC had said in 2007 that there was no evidence of warming in the Antarctic. However, the panel said that the latest observations showed that man-made emissions were having an impact on even the remotest continent.

Continues: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7050341.ece

Brian Cox on “the greatest age of discovery our civilization has known”

Professor Brian Cox, who will be delivering the Voltaire Lecture 2010 for the British Humanist Association and the South Place Ethical Society next month, is presenting a new series on BBC2, Wonders of the Solar System. “Science is different to all the other systems of thought, the belief systems that have been practiced in this city for millennia,” he says at one point, “because you don’t need faith in it, you can check that it works.”

Professor Brian Cox visits some of the most stunning locations on earth to describe how the laws of nature have carved natural wonders across the solar system.

In this first episode Brian explores the powerhouse of them all, the sun. In India he witnesses a total solar eclipse – when the link to the light and heat that sustains us is cut off for a few precious minutes.

But heat and light are not the only power of the sun over the solar system. In Norway, Brian watches the battle between the sun’s wind and earth, as the night sky glows with the northern lights.

Beyond earth, the solar wind continues, creating dazzling aurora on other planets. Brian makes contact with Voyager, a probe that has been travelling since its launch 30 years ago. Now 14 billion kilometres away, Voyager has just detected the solar wind is beginning to peter out. But even here we haven’t reached the end of the sun’s rule.

Brian explains how its greatest power, gravity, reaches out for hundreds of billions of kilometres, where the lightest gravitational touch encircles our solar system in a mysterious cloud of comets.

You can watch the first episode on iPlayer until next Sunday.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00rf172/Wonders_of_the_Solar_System_Empire_of_the_Sun/

IHN February 2010 (PDF)

The February 2010 issue of International Humanist News has been published. This edition includes a feature on the rights of the child.

read more

Did Galileo fudge the findings?

Galileo Galilei was right: Earth moves around the Sun, just as Nicolaus Copernicus said it did in 1543. But had Galileo followed the results of his observations to their logical conclusion, he should have backed another system — the Tychonic view that Earth didn’t move, and that everything else circled around it and the Sun, as developed by Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe in the sixteenth century.

This is the conclusion that Christopher Graney, a physicist at Jefferson Community and Technical College in Louisville, Kentucky, came to after reading manuscripts from another astronomer who was active in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century, at the same time as Galileo.

Graney suggested in 2008 that Galileo’s observations of stars were actually diffraction patterns called Airy disks — patterns of concentric circles that arise when light from a point source, such as a star, passes through a hole. Diffraction hadn’t been discovered in Galileo’s time, so he was unaware of the phenomenon and believed what his eyes, or his telescope, were telling him and used the observations to estimate the size and distance of stars. As a result, he got the distances of the stars too short by a factor of thousands (see ‘Galileo duped by diffraction‘).

Continues: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100305/full/news.2010.105.html

Sliding into Heresy

Christian Sliding into HeresyI crafted this image to illustrate the kick I get out of Christians chastising other Christians for sliding into heresy.  For I imagine these Christians watchdogs as envisioning their sliding colleague as leaving behind angelic clouds and descending blissfully into hell.

But where do the guardians of orthodoxy put the blue-dotted line of damnation?  Where on that sliding board do they see their colleague as no longer being a Christian?  Certainly heretics like me make it easy to decide — we just start telling you we aren’t Christian.  But many Christians slide down the board while all along joyfully still considering themselves to be Christians.  They keep claiming to have some sort of relationship with Jesus.

But do Christians really have a relationship with Jesus?  When I talk at any length with most of my reasonable Christian acquaintances, they admit that they don’t hear Jesus, touch Jesus, see Jesus, bowl with Jesus or watch TV with him.  It doesn’t take long to agree that they don’t have a “personal relationship” with Jesus in any normal sense of the phrase “personal relationship”.  But I understand how these Christians have an awe and reverence for God and how they see Jesus as God incarnate and how such imagery helps them to personalize God in their life.  I get that.  But that is a Jesus made of select gospel stories, Christmas holidays, church dinners and warm fuzzy feelings.  So I don’t get how that could be threatened by sliding down the heresy board.

Relatively few Christians really understand their sacred texts.  Most Christians could easily be exposed for holding some heretical views even when judged only by the doctrine of their own sect.  But they don’t care, for most Christian do not hold together the Jesus-in-their-head with theological propositions.  So those Christians who worry about heresy are sort of unique.  Yet when I question even these righteous orthodox saints about their relationship with Jesus, inevitably they want to claim it is a real relationship with a person and not just a relationship to ideas in their head.  They want to claim that their salvation is based on a personal relationship with the divine.  Yet when they do their heresy flag-waving dance they put emphasis on ideas and not a person.

These heresy watchdogs know that their Christian sect is a believist sect — a sect which maintains that correct belief is what wins a person a ticket to heaven.   But when accused of being a “believist”, they will try to deny it.   Nonetheless, their believist mentality is blatantly obvious when they are patrolling for heretics.  The contradictions to me are humorous, if not sad.

Caveat:  I understand how bad ideas can have bad consequences.  But when you hear what heretic-hounds count as dangerous ideas, they seem rather silly to me.  But then, apparently the Christian god made his truths silly to unbelievers.  The problem is, he made those truths seem silly to me when I was still a believer.  What is that all about?

———-
Related Posts:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tagged: Add new tag, Christian, Christianity, God, Jesus, Salvation

Homeopathy article FAIL

Rambling Daily Mail article gawps – without a hint of irony, let alone critical reflection – at dancer who claims regular homeopathy and the wearing of “infrared” knickers keeps them healthy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1256435/As-MPs-NHS-scrap-homeopathy-dance-boss-seen-GP-42-years-thanks-natural-remedies.html

The Loving Compassion of the Catholic Church

A few weeks ago, I mentioned briefly that the Catholic church had threatened to pull out of Washington, D.C., ending the social services they provide for thousands of people, if the city council passed a law recognizing same-sex marriage. Well, the council did pass the bill, same-sex marriage is now legal in D.C. (congratulations!), and [...]

An insight into home-schooling

Last week, I reported on the forthcoming grand opening of the New Life Academy in Hull, a fundamentalist Christian private school which will use the Accelerated Christian Education curriculum (something the school's website cheekily claims is "OFSTED approved", even though OFSTED doesn't "approve" curricula).

In that post, I quoted a passage from an ACE science textbook, which pertained to the existence, or not, of the Loch Ness Monster:
"Could a fish have developed into a dinosaur? As astonishing as it may seem, many evolutionists theorize that fish evolved into amphibians and amphibians into reptiles. This gradual change from fish to reptiles has no scientific basis. No transitional fossils have been or ever will be discovered because God created each type of fish, amphibian, and reptile as separate, unique animals. Any similarities that exist among them are due to the fact that one Master Craftsmen fashioned them all."
Informative stuff, I'm sure you'll agree. I was reminded of this this morning when I read this San Francisco Chronicle article, from the Associated Press, about the textbooks used by home-schooling parents in the US. Home-schooling is extremely popular with fundamentalist American parents, who see it as a useful way of avoiding exposing their children to corrupting influences, such as science. But as the article points out, not all parents who home-school do so for religious reasons, and some of those have been shocked to find that the bestselling home school science textbooks tend to have an anti-scientific bias. For instance, we learn that in Biology: Third Edition, from Bob Jones University Press (a quick Google shows Bob Jones is a fundamentalist college in South Carolina), the introduction states the following:
"Those who do not believe that the Bible is the inspired, inerrant Word of God will find many points in this book puzzling. This book was not written for them."
And then later in the book, young biologists are told that "Christian worldview ... is the only correct view of reality; anyone who rejects it will not only fail to reach heaven but also fail to see the world as it truly is."

When the majority of the 1.5 million Americans who receive home-schooling doing so because of their parents' religious views, that's a lot of children deprived of a proper science education. I'd be interested to know if there's a similar situation here in the UK.

Ethnic and religious violence in Nigerian, “roving bands of killers” massacre 500

Nigeria’s security forces have been put on high alert after a new burst of sectarian violence left over 500 people dead, most of them women and children hacked to death by machete wielding gangs.

The attack happened before dawn on Sunday morning when gangs of men descended on several mainly Christian villages near the central city of Jos, firing guns as they approached. Witnesses of the attack, which centred on the village of Dogo-Nahawa, described how victims were caught in animal traps and fishing nets as they tried to flee their attackers.

A resident of Dogo-Nahawa said that the attackers had fired guns as they entered the village, to lure their victims out of their houses. “The shooting was just meant to bring people from their houses and then when people came out they started cutting them with machetes,” said Peter Gyang, who lost his wife and two children .

Dan Manjang, a state government advisor, confirmed that 500 people had been killed. “We have been able to make 95 arrests but at the same time over 500 people have been killed in this heinous act … by Fulani herdsmen,” Mr Manjang said in a telephone interview.

Continues: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article7053487.ece

An Atheist’s Shrine

Tara Buddhist Statue

Tara

Buddhist Statue

Buddha

Shiva Hindu Statue

Shiva

Twenty-five years ago, while living in Asia, I started assembling my home shrine.  Hindus and Buddhists often have home shrines.  I liked the idea of having a visual reminder of the principles I hold dear.  I began my shrine with only the Nepalese Bodhisattva Tara.  Then two years later I added the Hindu god Shiva.  Finally, five years ago I added Shakyamuni Buddha in the center.

Though I certainly do not believe these statues represent actual spirits/deities, for me, they represent sides of the mind — aspects of reality.  Tara has always represented the softer side of reality for me — surrender, forgiveness, trust, compassion.  Shiva balances her by representing the harder side of reality — effort, discipline, discerning wisdom, justice.  I have long loved the way these two symbols capture these various aspects of our minds.  I added The Buddha to represent the middle path — the balancing between these two skillful means: softness and hardness.  I also keep images of Ganesh around, but he is more playful (see my post on the little lad).

I occasionally bow to these statues in silence while remembering to go through my day with compassion, discernment and balance.  It is an outwardly religious appearing gesture, much like our family prayer where we say “itadakimasu“, but as you can see, I claim the form, minus the spooks.  You can imagine how such things bother the Christians who accidentally walk into our house (many do not return).  But Atheists also see it as weird.  I can laugh with them, of course, but it is seriously important to me.

Related Posts:


Pope Petitions

There are three petitions on the UK Government's petition site. I have signed all three but you decide which you want to sign. I also recommend all atheist and secular bloggers promote these three petitions in their blogs, even if you are not a UK citizen and even if you disagree with some of them - you might have UK readers and you should let them decide (by all means, if you disagree, produce arguments against them - it is still up to the reader to decide the merits of your argument).

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to ask the Catholic Church to pay for the proposed visit of the Pope to the UK and relieve the taxpayer of the estimated £20 million cost.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/selfpaypope/
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to disassociate the British government from the Pope's intolerant views ahead of the Papal visit to Britain in September 2010. We urge the Prime Minister to make it clear that his government disagrees with the Pope's opposition to women's reproductive rights, gay equality, embryonic stem cell research and the use of condoms to prevent the spread of HIV. We ask the Prime Minister to express his disagreement with the Pope’s role in the cover-up of child sex abuse by Catholic clergy, his rehabilitation of the Holocaust-denying bishop Richard Williamson, and his decree paving the way for the beatification and sainthood of the war-time Pope, Pius XII, who stands accused of failing to speak out against the Holocaust. We also request the Prime Minister to assure us that the Pope’s visit will not be financed by the British taxpayer.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/ProtestthePope/
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Revoke the formal state visit given to the Pope Benedict XVI.
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Pope2010/